What business problem needs attention?
Identifies the issue without assuming the solution.
For consultants and high-ticket services
Define the problems, scope, authority, timing, and commercial context that make a discovery call worthwhile, then route each inquiry to the right next step.
The problem
Consulting inquiries often describe a symptom but omit the decision, stakeholder, scope, and timing context needed to evaluate an engagement. A good intake makes those unknowns visible before proposal work begins.
Qualification policy
A qualified consulting opportunity might involve a problem the practice can solve, an accountable decision owner, feasible timing, sufficient scope, and a commercial range that fits the engagement model.
Example criteria
These criteria belong to the consultant or service business. Qualyo applies the policy you save and leaves uncertain opportunities available for review.
Questions
Each question should support a rule, clarify contextual fit, or prepare the next conversation. More questions are not automatically better.
Identifies the issue without assuming the solution.
Adds importance and urgency context.
Prevents repeating approaches without context.
Makes authority and stakeholders visible.
Surfaces delivery feasibility.
Sets a practical engagement boundary.
Decision logic
The saved graph controls the route. AI can evaluate nuanced context when you choose, but it never redraws the path or replaces an explicit business rule.
Use fixed rules for geography, minimum scope, availability, or another requirement with an unambiguous answer.
Use optional AI when problem fit, urgency, and likely impact need to be considered across several answers.
Invite a strong fit to discovery, request review when material context is missing, or provide a clear resource or referral.
Routes
If: Problem, authority, scope, timing, and commercial context align
Strong fit → Discovery call
The first call can examine fit instead of collecting basic facts.
If: Potential fit remains but material context is missing
Needs review → Context request
The prospect knows exactly what is needed before scheduling.
If: Scope, expertise, or timing is outside the practice
Not qualified → Resource or referral
The response is useful without creating a false expectation.
Interactive example
This local example demonstrates the policy shape without collecting respondent data or pretending the sample criteria are universal.
Choose three non-personal opportunity signals to see how a high-ticket service business can combine firm boundaries with contextual review.
Problem fit
Choose a signal
Decision context
Waiting
Timing
Waiting
Step 1 of 3
Recommended qualification flow
Product boundaries
Production checklist
Preview both delivery modes and use representative strong-fit, uncertain, and non-fit answers before publishing.
Start from Discovery call or Project inquiry.
Write fixed engagement boundaries first.
Ask only for context used in a route or first call.
Add qualification criteria and a tested fallback.
Create missing-context and referral endings.
Run representative fit and non-fit submissions.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. Use short or long text, number, single- or multiple-choice, dropdown, email, phone, file-upload, and drawn-signature questions to collect structured context before routing.
Yes. Express hard boundaries with choices or Logic cards. Optional AI qualification can consider multiple earlier answers when the fit rule is genuinely contextual.
No. Qualyo can collect a drawn-signature response, but it does not create proposals, contracts, managed e-signature workflows, or invoices.
Every plan can send complete submission data through a webhook. CSV export and unlimited notification recipients are also available on every plan.
Yes. AI is optional. Choice routes, conditions, routers, and custom endings can define the whole process.
The Qualifier immediately takes the automatic qualify or disqualify fallback selected by the form owner. That fallback is visible and must be tested before publishing.
Continue in context